Of the many legal fictions enjoyed by judges, few have done as much damage to as many people as calling sex offender registries “regulatory.” The trick is that if it’s characterized as regulatory, then it’s not punitive. And if it’s punitive, then it opens a whole slew of constitutional rights that would render the concept unlawful. But if legislators squint and write the “r” word instead of the “p” word, and judges squint and agree, problem solved! Full Editorial
Related posts
-
MI: Michigan Sex Offender Registries Performance Audit Report shows problems
Source: audgen.michigan.gov 10/2025 Inaccuracies in MSOR information for 9 (20%) of 45 samples active registrants and... -
MI: Michigan GOP bill aims to ban pornography online, including content on “disconnection between biology and gender”
Source: cbsnews.com 9/15/25 A group of House Republicans has introduced a bill in Lansing that intends... -
MI: Sex offender registry update passes state Senate
Source: wemu.org 6/18/25 The Michigan Senate voted Tuesday to update the state’s sex offender registry laws...

The designation of punitive is the key. Even in present cases they’ll have to assess the idea of giving someone an extra 15, 25 and lifetime probation for these crimes. They won’t be able to do it which is why I believe the regulatory scam came about.
Don’t settle for incremental, people. The entire registry can and will be abolished.
That rumble coming from Michigan…… no no its not an earthquake…
Its the weight of the Constitution coming for california
Whewwwwwwwww !!