Of the many legal fictions enjoyed by judges, few have done as much damage to as many people as calling sex offender registries “regulatory.” The trick is that if it’s characterized as regulatory, then it’s not punitive. And if it’s punitive, then it opens a whole slew of constitutional rights that would render the concept unlawful. But if legislators squint and write the “r” word instead of the “p” word, and judges squint and agree, problem solved! Full Editorial
Related posts
-
MI: Berrien County prosecutor says names were incorrectly removed from sex offender registry
Source: wzzm13.com 9/21/26 BERRIEN COUNTY, Mich. — The Berrien County Prosecutor said some sex offenders have... -
Janice’s Journal: Congratulations, Michigan Registrants!
ACSOL congratulates more than 20,000 registrants in Michigan who are no longer required to register! They... -
MI: Michigan State Police Begins Removing Sex Offenders from Registry
Source: michigan.gov 9/11/26 “On September 9, 2026, the Michigan Supreme Court ruled that the 2021 Sex Offender Registration Act (SORA) amendments...

The designation of punitive is the key. Even in present cases they’ll have to assess the idea of giving someone an extra 15, 25 and lifetime probation for these crimes. They won’t be able to do it which is why I believe the regulatory scam came about.
Don’t settle for incremental, people. The entire registry can and will be abolished.
That rumble coming from Michigan…… no no its not an earthquake…
Its the weight of the Constitution coming for california
Whewwwwwwwww !!